IN THE MATTER OF AN
ARBITRATION
B E T W E E N:
NAV CANADA
(The Employer)
- and -
CANADIAN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ASSOCIATION
(The Association)
AND IN THE MATTER OF
A POLICY GRIEVANCE RE SICK LEAVE AND MOS
ARBITRATOR: Kenneth
P. Swan
APPEARANCES:
For the Employer:
Jacques
Emond, Counsel
Marie
Josée-Guérer, Director, Pension, Benefits and
Employee
Health Program
Joseph
Farrell, General Manager, IFR Operations
Tor
Veltheim, Senior Director, Human Resources and
Labour
Relations
For the Association:
Dougald
Brown, Counsel
Richard
Nye, Vice-President, Labour Relations
Greg
Myles, Western Regional Director
A W A R D
The
hearing in this matter was held in Ottawa on February 8 and 9 and March 9,
2001, at which time the parties agreed that the arbitrator had been properly
appointed pursuant to the collective agreement and that I had jurisdiction to
hear and determine the matter at issue
between them.
While
that matter initially arose from a policy grievance No. 00-009, discussions
between the parties were successful in reducing the issues to four. Those issues are as follows:
1. When
a controller is unable to provide or supervise air traffic control services
pursuant to Section 404.06(1)(a) of the Canadian Aviation Regulations
and is in receipt of sick pay with leave under Article 24.02 of the Collective
Agreement, is the Employer entitled to assign other duties to the controller
subject to confirmation that the controller is fit to perform such other
duties?
2. In
circumstances where a controller is on sick leave but the controller=s license is not affected (ie. suspended,
cancelled or not renewed) is the controller entitled to use all of his/her
earned sick leave credits before being placed on Maintenance of Salary?
3. Is
Nav Canada entitled to require a controller to perform other duties Aoutside@ the air traffic control bargaining unit as a
condition of receiving Maintenance of Salary under LOU 6-99?
4. Are
controllers entitled to exhaust all forms of earned sick leave credits,
including lieu leave and vacation leave,
before being placed on Maintenance of Salary under LOU 6-99?
While
there was some question between the parties as to whether the first of these
issues was correctly worded by the Union, that dispute will be resolved along
with the substance of the issues as identified. I therefore proceed on the basis of these questions to deal with
the matter as it appears before me for resolution.
As
will appear, the issues between the parties relate to the sick leave and other
income maintenance provisions of the collective agreement for air traffic
controllers who are ill, injured or disabled.
Medical issues involving Air Traffic Controllers must be understood
against a statutory backdrop which is complex in its nature and
application. The parties were agreed
that this statutory structure was adequately described in the award of the
present arbitrator in Re Nav Canada and Canadian Air Traffic Control
Association (Medical Examinations) (1998), 74 L.A.C. (4th) 163
(Swan):
The positions of the parties may
only be understood in the unique historical and legal context applicable to
this dispute. On November 1, 1996, NAV
CANADA took over ownership and operation of the national air navigation
system. NAV CANADA is a corporation
without share capital established to acquire, own, manage, operate, maintain
and develop the Canadian Civil Air Navigation System, on a not-for-profit
basis. By agreement dated April 1,
1996, NAV CANADA acquired all of the assets of the air navigation system from
Transport Canada, and effective November 1, 1996, some 6,400 employees were
transferred from the federal public service, including some 2,300 air traffic
control employees represented by the Association.
Those employees, previously
covered by the Public Service Staff Relations Act, are now in a bargaining unit
subject to the Canada Labour Code. While
this change has many implications, one of them is a broader scope for the
filing of policy grievances by the Association to challenge decisions of the
Employer which, when the Employer was Transport Canada, could only be enforced
by an individual employee. While there
are a number of different classifications covered by the collective agreement,
the vast majority are licensed Air Traffic Controllers (ATC), and the issues
raised by this grievance apply most directly to licensed ATCs.
Both before and after the
takeover by NAV CANADA, ATCs were recruited through a screening and interview
process, followed by a training program of six or more months at the Employer=s training facility in Cornwall,
Ontario. This was followed by
site-specific on-the-job training, and possibly more theoretical training,
after which a check out process of another several months takes place on a
one-to-one basis with a licensed ATC.
The evidence indicates that this training is very rigorous, and that
there are very significant drop-out rates throughout the process.
In
addition, there are stringent medical requirements established under the
Aeronautics Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. A-2, as amended, and under the Canadian
Aviation Regulations (CARs). Part IV,
subpart 4 of CARs details these medical requirements. Briefly, these regulations establish that in addition to the
technical requirements for licensing as an ATC, an employee must also hold a
valid medical certificate, without which any exercise or attempt to exercise
the privileges of the license is forbidden.
ATCs are required to hold a
medical certificate in medical category 2, which is defined under paragraph
424.17(3) of CARs. An initial
certification, and any renewal thereof, is valid pursuant to paragraph 424.04(3)
of CARs for a maximum period of 24 months for ATCs under the age of 40, and for
12 months thereafter. The requirements
are set out in painstaking detail, but the general requirement is summarized in
the following provisions of the definition of medical category 2:
2.1 The applicant shall be free from
any abnormality, congenital or acquired;
or
any active, latent, acute or chronic disability;
or
any wound, injury or sequelae from operation
such as would entail a degree of functional
incapacity which accredited medical conclusion indicates would interfere with
reliable performance of duties within the period of validity of the license.
2.2 The applicant shall not suffer from any disease
or disability which may render the applicant liable to a sudden or insidious
degradation of performance within the period of validity of the license.
Medical certificates are issued only after an examination by a Civil Aviation Medical Examiner (CAME). CAMEs are individually appointed based on familiarity with aviation medicine and the medical requirements of the various licenses involved in civil aviation. They may be private practitioners or public servants. Paragraph 424.04(2) includes the following requirements:
Every applicant for a medical certificate or revalidation thereof shall undergo a medical examination by a CAME.
Every applicant shall, at the time of the medical examination,
sign a declaration provided by the CAME stating whether the applicant has previously undergone a medical examination in connection with an application for a medical certificate or revalidation thereof and, where applicable, provide a statement that sets out the results of the most recent such examination;
answer all of the CAME=s questions that are pertinent to the assessment of the applicant=s medical fitness;
give written authorization for the disclosure of medical information to a physician named by the applicant; and
undergo any other examinations or tests that are required by the CAME in order to assess the applicant=s medical fitness.
Following the medical examination, the CAME may certify the employee as fit, unfit or deferred. If the employee is fit, the expiring medical certificate is extended for a period of 90 days to permit the procedure for recertification to continue. That procedure requires that all documentation from the medical examination be forwarded with the recommendation to the Regional Aviation Medical Officer (RAMO), an official of Health Canada. The package may then be referred to the Chief, Clinical Assessment for presentation to the Aviation Medical Review Board. At each level, the assessment may be reconsidered, and a conclusion reached at a lower level may be overruled. Persons who are found to be unfit to exercise their licenses, or whose certificates are not renewed, may appeal to the Civil Aviation Tribunal.
The regulatory structure also provides for individual responsibility for fitness of each licensed employee, in paragraph 404.06 of CARs as follows:
- Subject to subsection (3), no holder of a permit, licence or rating shall exercisethe privileges of the permit, licence or rating if
- one of the following circumstances exists and could impair the holder=s ability to exercise those privileges safely;
- the holder suffers from an illness, injury or disability,
- the holder is taking a drug, or
- the holder is receiving medical treatment;
- the holder has been involved in an aircraft accident that is wholly or partially the result of any of the circumstances referred to in paragraph (a);
- the holder has entered the thirtieth week of pregnancy, unless the medical certificate is issued in connection with an air traffic controller licence, in which case the holder may exercise the privileges of the permit, licence or rating until the onset of labour; or
- the holder has given birth in the preceding six weeks.
- No holder of a permit, licence or rating who is referred to in paragraph (1)(b), (c) or (d) shall exercise the privileges of the permit, licence or rating unless
- the holder has undergone a medical examination referred to in section 404.18; and
- the medical examiner has indicated on the holder=s medical certificate that the holder is medically fit to exercise the privileges of the permit, licence or rating.
- The Minister may, in writing, authorize the holder of a medical certificate to exercise, under the circumstances described in paragraph (1)(a) or (d), the privileges of the permit, licence or rating to which the medical certificate relates if such authorization is in the public interest and is not likely to affect aviation safety.
The Aeronautics Act also provides for
obligations placed on medical professionals in relation to licence holders, in
section 6.5:
6.5
(1) Where a physician or an optometrist
believes on reasonable grounds that a patient is a flight crew member, an air
traffic controller or other holder of a Canadian aviation document that imposes
standards of medical or optometric fitness, the physician or optometrist shall,
if in his opinion the patient has a medical or optometric condition that is
likely to constitute a hazard to aviation safety, inform a medical adviser
designated by the Minister forthwith of that opinion and the reasons therefor.
(2) The holder of a Canadian aviation document that imposes
standards of medical or optometric fitness shall, prior to any medical or
optometric examination of his person by a physician or optometrist, advise the
physician or optometrist that he is the holder of such a document.
(3) The Minister may make such use of any information provided
pursuant to subsection (1) as the Minister considers necessary in the interests
of aviation safety.
(4) No legal, disciplinary or other proceedings lie against a
physician or optometrist for anything done by him in good faith in compliance
with this section.
(5) Notwithstanding subsection (3), information provided pursuant
to subsection (1) is privileged and no person shall be required to disclose it
or give evidence relating to it in any legal, disciplinary or other proceedings
and the information so provided shall not be used in any such proceedings.
(6) The holder of a Canadian aviation document that imposes
standards of medical or optometric fitness shall be deemed, for the purposes of
this section, to have consented to the giving of information to a medical
adviser designated by the Minister under subsection (1) in the circumstances
referred to in that subsection.
The effect of all of these
provisions is that, if an ATC is found to be unfit in the medical certification
process, or self-reports a condition of unfitness, or is reported as unfit by a
physician or optometrist under section 6.5 of the Aeronautics Act, the ATC is
prohibited from working in that capacity.
The collective agreement recognizes, in various provisions, the
significant impact these stringent requirements can have on individual
employees. For example, Letter of
Understanding 3-91 provides for maintenance of salary for a period of one year
for ATCs with five years or more of active ATC employment. The collective agreement also includes sick
leave provisions and a long-term disability plan. The NAV CANADA pension plan continues provisions previously found
in the Public Service Superannuation Act for special early retirement on
medical grounds. There are also
policies in force for retraining and reassignment.
In
addition to this statutory backdrop, the following provisions of the collective
agreement are relevant:
Article 24
- Sick Leave
24.01
(a) An employee shall earn sick leave credits at
the rate of nine decimal three seven five (9.375) hours for each calendar month
for which that employee receives pay for at least ten (10) days. All operating employees in the bargaining
unit will in addition be credited 0.9375 hours for each calendar month for
which the employee receives pay for at least ten days.
(b) Effective
September 1, 1999 an employee shall earn sick leave credits at the rate of ten
decimal five nine (10.59) hours for
each calendar month for which that employee receives pay for at least ten (10)
days.
24.02 An employee
is eligible for sick leave with pay when the employee is unable to perform his
or her duties because of illness or injury provided that:
(a) the employee
has the necessary sick leave credits,
(b) the employee
satisfies NAV CANADA of this condition in such manner and at such time as may
be determined by NAV CANADA.
24.03 Unless
otherwise informed by NAV CANADA before or during the period of illness or
injury that a certificate from a qualified medical practitioner, licensed chiropractor,
dentist, dental surgeon or orthodontist will be required, a statement signed by
the employee stating that because of this illness or injury the employee was
unable to perform his or her duties shall, when delivered to NAV CANADA, be
considered as meeting the requirements of clause 24.02 (b):
(a) if the period
of leave requested does not exceed five (5) days,
and
(b) if in the
current fiscal year, the employee has not been granted more than ten (10) days= sick leave wholly on the basis of statements
signed by the employee.
24.04 An employee
is not eligible for sick leave with pay during any period in which the employee
is on leave of absence without pay or under suspension.
24.05 (a) Where an employee has insufficient or no
credits to cover the granting of sick leave with pay under the provisions of
24.02, sick leave with pay may, at the discretion of NAV CANADA, be granted for
a period of up to one hundred twenty three decimal seven five (123.75) hours
subject to the deductions of such advanced leave from any sick leave credits
subsequently earned.
(b) Effective
September 1, 1999 for those employees who make a request under 24.05(a) where
the employee has insufficient or no credits to cover the granting of sick leave
with pay under the provisions of 24.02, sick leave with pay may, at the
discretion of NAV CANADA, be granted for a period of up to one hundred and
twenty-seven decimal zero five (127.05) hours subject to the deduction of such
advanced leave from any sick leave credits subsequently earned.
24.06 The amount
of sick leave with pay already credited to an employee by NAV CANADA at the
time this agreement is signed shall be retained by the employee.
24.07 NAV CANADA
agrees that in the event of an employer initiated release for incapacity by
reason of ill health, an employee may exhaust any remaining accumulated sick
leave credits prior to his or her release .
. . .
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING (6-99)
Mr. Fazal Bhimji
Chief
Negotiator
Canadian
Air Traffic Control Association
162
Cleopatra Drive
Nepean,
Ontario
K2G 5X2
Dear Mr.
Bhimji:
This
is to confirm an understanding reached during the current negotiations in
respect of removal from active control duties for medical reasons.